First, it is important to talk about the complex context in which LGBTQI+ people live, and to identify the systems of oppression, which have an impact on their external and internal experiences, sense of self and quality of life. The actual instances of violence, abuse and other manifestations of prejudices are just the tip of the iceberg: below the surface we can find the systems of oppression, the overarching ideas and mechanism that orchestrates our biases.
To refer back to The LGBTQI+ Narratives Map exercise in Module 1, systems of oppression are related to dominant ideas and ideologies in the layer of Macrosystems. These ideas and ideologies are constantly played out in each of the systems: in institutions, institutional relations, communitines, interpersonal relationships, and also intrapersonally.

The LGBTQI+ Narratives Map from Module 1
| The LGBTQI+ Narratives Map is based on Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. According to this theory we live and navigate in multiple social systems that are different in their sizes, distances from us, direct or indirect availability.
Ecological systems theory. (2021). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecological_systems_theory&oldid=1038677351 |
Heteronormative society
Heterosexism refers to the belief that everyone is heterosexual, which develops a steady systemic institutionalization of attitudes and biases that privileges those who identify as heterosexual and/or are in heterosexual relationships. The heteronormative society in which we all live in is based on the (un)questionable truth that heterosexual identities and relationships are the norm.
Similarly, the notion that there are only two genders based on one’s sex assignments at birth is described as genderism. These beliefs are enforced in various contexts and institutionalized in many ways. The most simple examples are the ones with the labels “Male” and “Female” we see on the signs of toilets in private, public, corporate, administrative, recreational places, or the boxes that we tick every time when apply to a job, a university etc. So, imagine someone who identifies as transgender in a daily situation where they have to constantly make a decision to compromise with their genuine gender identity. Coming from a privileged position of being heterosexual cisgender professionals, these elements of reality might not sound like a big thing. But they, along many others, shape a constant sense of shame, misfit, being wrong, not belonging, being invisible in someone who identifies as gender queer (as an umbrella term for all who don’t fall in the cisgender category).